Add a couple of checks to FrameBuffer while we're continuing to look at RtpFrameReferenceFinder.
BUG=chromium:679306
TBR=terelius@webrtc.org, philipel@webrtc.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2879073002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18140}
diff --git a/webrtc/modules/video_coding/frame_buffer2.cc b/webrtc/modules/video_coding/frame_buffer2.cc
index 8d86a64..584c2f0 100644
--- a/webrtc/modules/video_coding/frame_buffer2.cc
+++ b/webrtc/modules/video_coding/frame_buffer2.cc
@@ -345,11 +345,15 @@
void FrameBuffer::PropagateDecodability(const FrameInfo& info) {
TRACE_EVENT0("webrtc", "FrameBuffer::PropagateDecodability");
+ RTC_CHECK(info.num_dependent_frames < FrameInfo::kMaxNumDependentFrames);
for (size_t d = 0; d < info.num_dependent_frames; ++d) {
auto ref_info = frames_.find(info.dependent_frames[d]);
RTC_DCHECK(ref_info != frames_.end());
- RTC_DCHECK_GT(ref_info->second.num_missing_decodable, 0U);
- --ref_info->second.num_missing_decodable;
+ // TODO(philipel): Look into why we've seen this happen.
+ if (ref_info != frames_.end()) {
+ RTC_DCHECK_GT(ref_info->second.num_missing_decodable, 0U);
+ --ref_info->second.num_missing_decodable;
+ }
}
}
@@ -418,7 +422,14 @@
// frames are inserted or decoded.
ref_info->second.dependent_frames[ref_info->second.num_dependent_frames] =
key;
- ++ref_info->second.num_dependent_frames;
+ RTC_DCHECK_LT(ref_info->second.num_dependent_frames,
+ (FrameInfo::kMaxNumDependentFrames - 1));
+ // TODO(philipel): Look into why this could happen and handle
+ // appropriately.
+ if (ref_info->second.num_dependent_frames <
+ (FrameInfo::kMaxNumDependentFrames - 1)) {
+ ++ref_info->second.num_dependent_frames;
+ }
}
RTC_DCHECK_LE(ref_info->second.num_missing_continuous,
ref_info->second.num_missing_decodable);