Reformat the WebRTC code base
Running clang-format with chromium's style guide.
The goal is n-fold:
* providing consistency and readability (that's what code guidelines are for)
* preventing noise with presubmit checks and git cl format
* building on the previous point: making it easier to automatically fix format issues
* you name it
Please consider using git-hyper-blame to ignore this commit.
Bug: webrtc:9340
Change-Id: I694567c4cdf8cee2860958cfe82bfaf25848bb87
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/81185
Reviewed-by: Patrik Höglund <phoglund@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#23660}diff --git a/rtc_base/buffer_unittest.cc b/rtc_base/buffer_unittest.cc
index e3b7d46..ae976f1 100644
--- a/rtc_base/buffer_unittest.cc
+++ b/rtc_base/buffer_unittest.cc
@@ -208,16 +208,16 @@
EXPECT_EQ(buf.size(), 15u);
EXPECT_EQ(buf.capacity(), 15u);
EXPECT_FALSE(buf.empty());
- const char *data = buf.data<char>();
+ const char* data = buf.data<char>();
buf.Clear();
EXPECT_EQ(buf.size(), 0u);
- EXPECT_EQ(buf.capacity(), 15u); // Hasn't shrunk.
- EXPECT_EQ(buf.data<char>(), data); // No reallocation.
+ EXPECT_EQ(buf.capacity(), 15u); // Hasn't shrunk.
+ EXPECT_EQ(buf.data<char>(), data); // No reallocation.
EXPECT_TRUE(buf.empty());
}
TEST(BufferTest, TestLambdaSetAppend) {
- auto setter = [] (rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) {
+ auto setter = [](rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) {
for (int i = 0; i != 15; ++i)
av[i] = kTestData[i];
return 15;
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
}
TEST(BufferTest, TestLambdaSetAppendSigned) {
- auto setter = [] (rtc::ArrayView<int8_t> av) {
+ auto setter = [](rtc::ArrayView<int8_t> av) {
for (int i = 0; i != 15; ++i)
av[i] = kTestData[i];
return 15;
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
}
TEST(BufferTest, TestLambdaAppendEmpty) {
- auto setter = [] (rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) {
+ auto setter = [](rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) {
for (int i = 0; i != 15; ++i)
av[i] = kTestData[i];
return 15;
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
}
TEST(BufferTest, TestLambdaAppendPartial) {
- auto setter = [] (rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) {
+ auto setter = [](rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) {
for (int i = 0; i != 7; ++i)
av[i] = kTestData[i];
return 7;
@@ -283,15 +283,15 @@
Buffer buf;
EXPECT_EQ(buf.AppendData(15, setter), 7u);
- EXPECT_EQ(buf.size(), 7u); // Size is exactly what we wrote.
- EXPECT_GE(buf.capacity(), 7u); // Capacity is valid.
- EXPECT_NE(buf.data<char>(), nullptr); // Data is actually stored.
+ EXPECT_EQ(buf.size(), 7u); // Size is exactly what we wrote.
+ EXPECT_GE(buf.capacity(), 7u); // Capacity is valid.
+ EXPECT_NE(buf.data<char>(), nullptr); // Data is actually stored.
EXPECT_FALSE(buf.empty());
}
TEST(BufferTest, TestMutableLambdaSetAppend) {
uint8_t magic_number = 17;
- auto setter = [magic_number] (rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) mutable {
+ auto setter = [magic_number](rtc::ArrayView<uint8_t> av) mutable {
for (int i = 0; i != 15; ++i) {
av[i] = magic_number;
++magic_number;
@@ -304,9 +304,9 @@
Buffer buf;
EXPECT_EQ(buf.SetData(15, setter), 15u);
EXPECT_EQ(buf.AppendData(15, setter), 15u);
- EXPECT_EQ(buf.size(), 30u); // Size is exactly what we wrote.
- EXPECT_GE(buf.capacity(), 30u); // Capacity is valid.
- EXPECT_NE(buf.data<char>(), nullptr); // Data is actually stored.
+ EXPECT_EQ(buf.size(), 30u); // Size is exactly what we wrote.
+ EXPECT_GE(buf.capacity(), 30u); // Capacity is valid.
+ EXPECT_NE(buf.data<char>(), nullptr); // Data is actually stored.
EXPECT_FALSE(buf.empty());
for (uint8_t i = 0; i != buf.size(); ++i) {