rcu: Eliminate deadlock between CPU hotplug and expedited grace periods
Currently, the expedited grace-period primitives do get_online_cpus().
This greatly simplifies their implementation, but means that calls
to them holding locks that are acquired by CPU-hotplug notifiers (to
say nothing of calls to these primitives from CPU-hotplug notifiers)
can deadlock. But this is starting to become inconvenient, as can be
seen here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/5/754. The problem in this
case is that some developers need to acquire a mutex from a CPU-hotplug
notifier, but also need to hold it across a synchronize_rcu_expedited().
As noted above, this currently results in deadlock.
This commit avoids the deadlock and retains the simplicity by creating
a try_get_online_cpus(), which returns false if the get_online_cpus()
reference count could not immediately be incremented. If a call to
try_get_online_cpus() returns true, the expedited primitives operate as
before. If a call returns false, the expedited primitives fall back to
normal grace-period operations. This falling back of course results in
increased grace-period latency, but only during times when CPU hotplug
operations are actually in flight. The effect should therefore be
negligible during normal operation.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 81e2a38..356450f 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@
/* Lockdep annotations for get/put_online_cpus() and cpu_hotplug_begin/end() */
#define cpuhp_lock_acquire_read() lock_map_acquire_read(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
+#define cpuhp_lock_acquire_tryread() \
+ lock_map_acquire_tryread(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
#define cpuhp_lock_acquire() lock_map_acquire(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
#define cpuhp_lock_release() lock_map_release(&cpu_hotplug.dep_map)
@@ -91,10 +93,22 @@
mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
cpu_hotplug.refcount++;
mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
-
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_online_cpus);
+bool try_get_online_cpus(void)
+{
+ if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
+ return true;
+ if (!mutex_trylock(&cpu_hotplug.lock))
+ return false;
+ cpuhp_lock_acquire_tryread();
+ cpu_hotplug.refcount++;
+ mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+ return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(try_get_online_cpus);
+
void put_online_cpus(void)
{
if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index d7a3b13..133e472 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2940,11 +2940,6 @@
* restructure your code to batch your updates, and then use a single
* synchronize_sched() instead.
*
- * Note that it is illegal to call this function while holding any lock
- * that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier. And yes, it is also illegal
- * to call this function from a CPU-hotplug notifier. Failing to observe
- * these restriction will result in deadlock.
- *
* This implementation can be thought of as an application of ticket
* locking to RCU, with sync_sched_expedited_started and
* sync_sched_expedited_done taking on the roles of the halves
@@ -2994,7 +2989,12 @@
*/
snap = atomic_long_inc_return(&rsp->expedited_start);
firstsnap = snap;
- get_online_cpus();
+ if (!try_get_online_cpus()) {
+ /* CPU hotplug operation in flight, fall back to normal GP. */
+ wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
+ atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_normal);
+ return;
+ }
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(raw_smp_processor_id()));
/*
@@ -3041,7 +3041,12 @@
* and they started after our first try, so their grace
* period works for us.
*/
- get_online_cpus();
+ if (!try_get_online_cpus()) {
+ /* CPU hotplug operation in flight, use normal GP. */
+ wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
+ atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_normal);
+ return;
+ }
snap = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_start);
smp_mb(); /* ensure read is before try_stop_cpus(). */
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index e2c5910..387dd45 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -793,11 +793,6 @@
* In fact, if you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop,
* please restructure your code to batch your updates, and then Use a
* single synchronize_rcu() instead.
- *
- * Note that it is illegal to call this function while holding any lock
- * that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier. And yes, it is also illegal
- * to call this function from a CPU-hotplug notifier. Failing to observe
- * these restriction will result in deadlock.
*/
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
{
@@ -819,7 +814,11 @@
* being boosted. This simplifies the process of moving tasks
* from leaf to root rcu_node structures.
*/
- get_online_cpus();
+ if (!try_get_online_cpus()) {
+ /* CPU-hotplug operation in flight, fall back to normal GP. */
+ wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
+ return;
+ }
/*
* Acquire lock, falling back to synchronize_rcu() if too many