[libcxx] Never use <cassert> within libc++
Summary:
It is my opinion that libc++ should never use `<cassert>`, including in the `dylib`. This patch remove all uses of `assert` from within libc++ and replaces most of them with `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` instead.
Additionally this patch turn `LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS` off by default, because the standard library should not be aborting user programs unless explicitly asked to.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, compnerd, smeenai
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29063
llvm-svn: 292883
Cr-Mirrored-From: sso://chromium.googlesource.com/_direct/external/github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Cr-Mirrored-Commit: d5fd7d7ea152be8e0c6bed31be690cb020e9d96b
diff --git a/src/condition_variable.cpp b/src/condition_variable.cpp
index 25e6603..3f60727 100644
--- a/src/condition_variable.cpp
+++ b/src/condition_variable.cpp
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#include "condition_variable"
#include "thread"
#include "system_error"
-#include "cassert"
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
diff --git a/src/experimental/filesystem/path.cpp b/src/experimental/filesystem/path.cpp
index 96b81f7..daf2c2b 100644
--- a/src/experimental/filesystem/path.cpp
+++ b/src/experimental/filesystem/path.cpp
@@ -6,11 +6,9 @@
// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-#undef NDEBUG
#include "experimental/filesystem"
#include "string_view"
#include "utility"
-#include "cassert"
namespace { namespace parser
{
@@ -113,7 +111,6 @@
void decrement() noexcept {
const PosPtr REnd = &Path.front() - 1;
const PosPtr RStart = getCurrentTokenStartPos() - 1;
- assert(RStart != REnd);
switch (State) {
case PS_AtEnd: {
@@ -322,7 +319,6 @@
auto NextCh = PP.peek();
if (NextCh && *NextCh == '/') {
++PP;
- assert(PP.State == PathParser::PS_InRootDir);
return createView(__pn_.data(), &PP.RawEntry.back());
}
return PP.RawEntry;
diff --git a/src/mutex.cpp b/src/mutex.cpp
index 338b79f..b858e88 100644
--- a/src/mutex.cpp
+++ b/src/mutex.cpp
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
#include "mutex"
#include "limits"
#include "system_error"
-#include "cassert"
#include "include/atomic_support.h"
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
@@ -45,7 +44,7 @@
{
int ec = __libcpp_mutex_unlock(&__m_);
(void)ec;
- assert(ec == 0);
+ _LIBCPP_ASSERT(ec == 0, "call to mutex::unlock failed");
}
// recursive_mutex
@@ -61,7 +60,7 @@
{
int e = __libcpp_recursive_mutex_destroy(&__m_);
(void)e;
- assert(e == 0);
+ _LIBCPP_ASSERT(e == 0, "call to ~recursive_mutex() failed");
}
void
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@
{
int e = __libcpp_recursive_mutex_unlock(&__m_);
(void)e;
- assert(e == 0);
+ _LIBCPP_ASSERT(e == 0, "call to recursive_mutex::unlock() failed");
}
bool
diff --git a/src/system_error.cpp b/src/system_error.cpp
index 9411499..cbbbb5d 100644
--- a/src/system_error.cpp
+++ b/src/system_error.cpp
@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@
#include "cstring"
#include "cstdio"
#include "cstdlib"
-#include "cassert"
#include "string"
#include "string.h"
+#include "__debug"
#if defined(__ANDROID__)
#include <android/api-level.h>
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
std::snprintf(buffer, strerror_buff_size, "Unknown error %d", ev);
return string(buffer);
} else {
- assert(new_errno == ERANGE);
+ _LIBCPP_ASSERT(new_errno == ERANGE, "unexpected error from ::strerr_r");
// FIXME maybe? 'strerror_buff_size' is likely to exceed the
// maximum error size so ERANGE shouldn't be returned.
std::abort();