[libcxx] Add availability markup for bad_optional_access, bad_variant_access and bad_any_cast
Reviewers: dexonsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, arphaman, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53256
llvm-svn: 347219
Cr-Mirrored-From: sso://chromium.googlesource.com/_direct/external/github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Cr-Mirrored-Commit: 8a063df19435af25eadd30734be1b76275cbb56b
diff --git a/include/variant b/include/variant
index f9505bf..b33b1c4 100644
--- a/include/variant
+++ b/include/variant
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
namespace std { // explicitly not using versioning namespace
-class _LIBCPP_EXCEPTION_ABI bad_variant_access : public exception {
+class _LIBCPP_EXCEPTION_ABI _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS bad_variant_access : public exception {
public:
virtual const char* what() const _NOEXCEPT;
};
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@
_LIBCPP_NORETURN
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
void __throw_bad_variant_access() {
#ifndef _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS
throw bad_variant_access();
@@ -1321,6 +1322,7 @@
template <size_t _Ip, class _Vp>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr auto&& __generic_get(_Vp&& __v) {
using __variant_detail::__access::__variant;
if (!__holds_alternative<_Ip>(__v)) {
@@ -1331,6 +1333,7 @@
template <size_t _Ip, class... _Types>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr variant_alternative_t<_Ip, variant<_Types...>>& get(
variant<_Types...>& __v) {
static_assert(_Ip < sizeof...(_Types));
@@ -1340,6 +1343,7 @@
template <size_t _Ip, class... _Types>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr variant_alternative_t<_Ip, variant<_Types...>>&& get(
variant<_Types...>&& __v) {
static_assert(_Ip < sizeof...(_Types));
@@ -1349,6 +1353,7 @@
template <size_t _Ip, class... _Types>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr const variant_alternative_t<_Ip, variant<_Types...>>& get(
const variant<_Types...>& __v) {
static_assert(_Ip < sizeof...(_Types));
@@ -1358,6 +1363,7 @@
template <size_t _Ip, class... _Types>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr const variant_alternative_t<_Ip, variant<_Types...>>&& get(
const variant<_Types...>&& __v) {
static_assert(_Ip < sizeof...(_Types));
@@ -1367,6 +1373,7 @@
template <class _Tp, class... _Types>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr _Tp& get(variant<_Types...>& __v) {
static_assert(!is_void_v<_Tp>);
return _VSTD::get<__find_exactly_one_t<_Tp, _Types...>::value>(__v);
@@ -1374,6 +1381,7 @@
template <class _Tp, class... _Types>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr _Tp&& get(variant<_Types...>&& __v) {
static_assert(!is_void_v<_Tp>);
return _VSTD::get<__find_exactly_one_t<_Tp, _Types...>::value>(
@@ -1382,6 +1390,7 @@
template <class _Tp, class... _Types>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr const _Tp& get(const variant<_Types...>& __v) {
static_assert(!is_void_v<_Tp>);
return _VSTD::get<__find_exactly_one_t<_Tp, _Types...>::value>(__v);
@@ -1389,6 +1398,7 @@
template <class _Tp, class... _Types>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr const _Tp&& get(const variant<_Types...>&& __v) {
static_assert(!is_void_v<_Tp>);
return _VSTD::get<__find_exactly_one_t<_Tp, _Types...>::value>(
@@ -1521,6 +1531,7 @@
template <class _Visitor, class... _Vs>
inline _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_THROW_BAD_VARIANT_ACCESS
constexpr decltype(auto) visit(_Visitor&& __visitor, _Vs&&... __vs) {
using __variant_detail::__visitation::__variant;
bool __results[] = {__vs.valueless_by_exception()...};