blob: fab4c4ed4deca76146ae0dd1dee32506a601eaab [file] [log] [blame]
drha0c01762015-01-05 16:27:43 +00001# 2015-01-05
2#
3# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
4# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
5#
6# May you do good and not evil.
7# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
8# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
9#
10#***********************************************************************
11#
12# This file verifies that INSERT operations with a very large number of
13# VALUE terms works and does not hit the SQLITE_LIMIT_COMPOUND_SELECT limit.
14#
15
16set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
17source $testdir/tester.tcl
18set testprefix selectG
19
drh6fab3d42015-01-06 16:53:49 +000020# Do an INSERT with a VALUES clause that contains 100,000 entries. Verify
21# that this insert happens quickly (in less than 10 seconds). Actually, the
22# insert will normally happen in less than 0.5 seconds on a workstation, but
23# we allow plenty of overhead for slower machines. The speed test checks
24# for an O(N*N) inefficiency that was once in the code and that would make
25# the insert run for over a minute.
26#
27do_test 100 {
28 set sql "CREATE TABLE t1(x);\nINSERT INTO t1(x) VALUES"
29 for {set i 1} {$i<100000} {incr i} {
30 append sql "($i),"
31 }
32 append sql "($i);"
33 set microsec [lindex [time {db eval $sql}] 0]
34 db eval {
35 SELECT count(x), sum(x), avg(x), $microsec<10000000 FROM t1;
36 }
37} {100000 5000050000 50000.5 1}
drha0c01762015-01-05 16:27:43 +000038
drhb058d052018-01-14 20:12:23 +000039# 2018-01-14. A 100K-entry VALUES clause within a scalar expression does
40# not cause processor stack overflow.
41#
42do_test 110 {
43 set sql "SELECT (VALUES"
44 for {set i 1} {$i<100000} {incr i} {
45 append sql "($i),"
46 }
47 append sql "($i));"
48 db eval $sql
49} {1}
50
51# Only the left-most term of a multi-valued VALUES within a scalar
52# expression is evaluated.
53#
54do_test 120 {
55 set n [llength [split [db eval "explain $sql"] \n]]
56 expr {$n<10}
57} {1}
58
drha0c01762015-01-05 16:27:43 +000059finish_test